News

His name is Rupert (Article published in Country Squire Magazine)

His name is Rupert

I reckon if you travelled the length and breadth of the land, you would be hard pushed to find many folk that wouldn’t rather like to give two-tier Keir the proverbial Foxtrot Oscar. He is much despised and for good reason. For me, one of the most objectionable things about him is that he appears as this ineffectual, weak-kneed puppet-like administrator who refuses to answer a single question until his Master has given him the script. He is not a leader. And yet once hidden behind the safety of the woefully neglected Sarah Brown vegetable garden at No.10, he will start thinking up the most hideous, authoritarian policies that risk changing the character of the country. He is like a cowardly step-dad who can’t decide how to respond when his little step-daughter asks for a sweetie, but then just before bed retires to his laptop and docks her pocket money (stored on her digital wallet) without telling her.

Starmer may be gone by May, but let’s not pretend that things will be any merrier in his aftermath. It is difficult to imagine the likes of Rachel Reeves or Angela Rayner running the local public conveniences, let alone the country. These people are incompetent and it is frankly scandalous that they have been able to hold such esteemed offices. The vast majority of those sitting on the Front Benches are DEI hires, people that have been promoted well-beyond their ability. The sad truth is that this is obvious to everyone and it is embarrassing that these people represent our country. Step outside Blighty, and you will see what I mean. People will ask you “what has become of Britain?”; “how can Britons put up with this?”; “why are your leaders ruining your country?”. These are all reasonable questions, and the answers are not straightforward because throughout history it is difficult to find examples of self-loathing leaders who despise their countries. And yet that seems to be the infelicitous status quo.

In order to put so many of these wrongs right, I believe we don’t just need a new leader or even another party in power. We need deep structural and ideological change. The problems we face are not just party-oriented and we must stop kidding ourselves that is the case. One such structural change that must take place is the need to change the system whereby MPs can become Ministers without any knowledge whatsoever of said field. I suppose this is a remnant of more nepotistic times, but do we really want a Minister of Defence who thinks an F16 is a camera setting or a Minister of Health who thinks Corona is something you look at through a telescope (and not a microscope)? Would it not be better to have as a Minister of Health someone who has spent their life working in the medical industry and actually understands the issues at hand, i.e. the fact that the NHS will continue to be a financial black-hole until it becomes affordable for all as opposed to free for all, and until it stops wasting tens of millions of pounds on diversity consultants.

To ensure that once again the Front Benches are filled with competent people who reached that position through their ability, we need ideological change. As I see it, all the problems in the UK are ideological. Many people think that MPs run the country. Not so. The country is run by the Civil Service and the Civil Service is saturated in the DEI ideology, from top to bottom. The vast majority of people at the Home Office who make decisions as to who can stay will be migrants, and what is more migrants from countries whose values are far from our own. Can this be right? DEI is a nihilistic, losers’ charter and a new ideology for a restored Britain shouldn’t just stop it, but should criminalise it. Employers who discriminate against white Britons in favour of migrants should be imprisoned. These changes need to be systemic and apply to employment, schooling, higher education, social housing and benefits, healthcare etc. All this should be covered in new legislation that puts the interests of the British people first. Let’s call it the Patriots’ Act.

Many sensible countries like Kenya have employment policies whereby in order to give a job to a foreigner, you have to prove that a Kenyan could not carry out such employment. Why in the UK do we, implicitly at least, do the opposite? Why should white Britons be constantly at the back of the queue? These are the kinds of questions that more and more Britons are rightly asking. It is not populist, Far Right or any other such label. It is not about left or right. It is about right and wrong, and is just plain common sense that we put people whose investment in Britain stretches back generations first. This is what most sane countries do.

Thankfully, there is one Member of Parliament that understands all these issues better than most. His name is Rupert. Rupert Lowe, an independent MP for Great Yarmouth (cut loose by Farage). Rupert is everything an MP should be. He entered politics later in life after a successful career in the City and in business. He is also a farmer, but most importantly he just wants to restore Britain and is happy to cross any party-political divides to do so. He understands that stopping the dinghies is not going to be some kind of panacea. He wants millions who don’t wish to assimilate to British life to be deported, for British citizens only to vote in our elections and is building effective cross-party opposition against digital ID. He gives his salary to local charities and in everything he does he puts the country first because he wants the kind of Britain that his grandson is growing up in to be one still worth living in. Now, those values are the kind we should be supporting, not the Prime Minister’s ideological perversion that “it is British to be diverse”.
Made on
Tilda